Just bricks in the wall

What does the future hold for teachers in Bangladesh?

It is a common perception that in order to better education, we have to increase the number of teachers.

I feel it’s a fairly accepted hypothesis as well, Our rural areas lack teachers.

Increase the number, and we’re good, Nobel Laureate Abhijit Banerjee’s experiments in rural India turned that logic on its head.

Through them, he noted that increasing the number of teachers in schools had no discernible impact on the education level test scores for students remained unchanged. 

This, naturally, got me thinking.

Now I’m aware that one set of experiments should not be swaying my belief in such an established line of reasoning.

But, the man does have a Nobel Prize, so I couldn’t completely discount it either.

Reading about Dr Banerjee’s experiment brought about the obvious question: What was the future of teachers? 

Technology continues to become more prevalent. Online education’s importance and necessity magnifies.

The fourth industrial revolution brings inevitable and undeniable changes. Through all this, perhaps the question, “will we need less and less teachers?” is not completely invalid. 

Will we eventually have robots and AI taking our classes?

Returning to Dr Banerjee’s experiment, why have we even invested in teachers?

Are they even making a difference?

The result of his experiment goes against everything that educational institutions have continued to speak about that of the importance of teachers. 

The much touted teacher-student ratio is just a myth then, yes?

It’s easy to jump to those conclusions. 

A closer look at Dr Banerjee’s experiment gives us a very important insight far more often than not, it is not the teachers that are at fault. 

It is the system.

Dr Banerjee’s experiments were in schools in rural Rajasthan in India, in 20 schools where he doubled the number of teachers in the school.

He repeated the experiment in Mumbai, cutting down class sizes even further. 

No effect. Test scores remained the same.

Dr Banerjee thought long and hard about why it was that an almost universally regarded truth that teachers helped students succeed was not being replicated in his experiments. 

Now, it’s safe to assume that these experiments are relevant for Bangladesh.

The lessons we learn are extremely important for us to shape our own education for the future.

There is content that needs to be delivered to the child every day.

There’s a syllabus, you follow that.

And then, that’s the best you can do.

The fact that the child may or may not get it.

This is really an extremely underprivileged area.

Parents [often] were in no position to support their children.

So if the children fall behind, they fall behind.

What’s happening is that the teacher was just teaching any child who managed to stay with the teacher, but the rest of the children were behind.

There was no mechanism for integrating them.

Today’s material is, we’ll learn these kinds of words, if you don’t follow that’s too bad for you.

We have actually lots of evidence suggesting that that’s the right explanation.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak.